{"id":959,"date":"2019-11-04T18:14:38","date_gmt":"2019-11-04T12:44:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/online.2iim.com\/cat-exam\/blogs\/?p=959"},"modified":"2019-12-21T17:29:35","modified_gmt":"2019-12-21T11:59:35","slug":"cat-2019-score-prediction-by-4-time-100-iler","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/online.2iim.com\/cat-exam\/blogs\/cat-preparation-strategy\/cat-2019-score-prediction-by-4-time-100-iler\/","title":{"rendered":"CAT 2019 Score Prediction by 4 time 100 %iler"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"CAT<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Disclaimers Ahead:<\/strong> This is a CAT 2019 Score prediction based on years of experience from taking this exam. However, like every other prediction, there are great chances of this being proved true or otherwise. Start off with this assumption: <\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"CAT<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

CAT 2019 Score Prediction<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

This article will give you a sense of what could be expected<\/strong> from CAT<\/strong> 2019<\/em>. If you are preparing for CAT, for the last few months, this article might mean a reasonable starting point in terms of what to aim for, if you are planning for a set of b schools, for instance b-schools in the top ten ranking<\/a>. These numbers give you a good anchor point to start with. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Before we jump in to CAT 2019 Score prediction, we will look at the assumptions made and the predicted scores section wise. At the end of the Article you can find “The Winning Strategy” for CAT 2019!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Quantitative Aptitude<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Quantitative Aptitude<\/a> for CAT 2018 was much tougher than CAT 17. So the assumption is that CAT 2019 Quantitative Aptitude section will be a smidgen easier than CAT 2018. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Scores<\/th>Percentiles<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
64+<\/td>99.5+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
52-55<\/td>99.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41-45<\/td>95.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
33-35<\/td>90.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25-29<\/td>80.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n

Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

About 3+ full sets should pitch you north of 99th Percentile in the DILR Section<\/a>. Slightly below 3 full sets should be around 95th percentile in the DILR Section. To top it off, if you get two<\/strong> sets<\/em> right, you are crossing 90th<\/strong> percentile, looking at the past 3-4 year trends. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Scores<\/th>Percentile<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
50+<\/td>99.5+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
41-45<\/td>99.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
32-36<\/td>95.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24-27<\/td>90.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18-20<\/td>80.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n

Verbal Ability and Reading Comprehension<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

VARC<\/a> sectional percentiles hinge on accuracy<\/strong>, and pretty much on accuracy<\/em> only<\/strong>. The difference between 99.5 and a 95 is not going to be insanely different attempts, but pretty much the accuracy game and nothing else. <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Scores<\/th>Percentile<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
80+<\/td>99.5+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
72-76<\/td>99.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
60-66<\/td>95.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
48-54<\/td>90.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
38-44<\/td>80.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n

Overall CAT 2019 Score Vs Percentile<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Overall, you should focus on insanely high Accuracy<\/strong> on Quants<\/em> and DILR<\/em>, and about 80+<\/strong> % accuracy<\/strong> in the VARC<\/em> Section. Natural tendency is to push the Attempts number high, if we want to maximise the score. But try and refrain from it. In reality, how much you get right, how much control you have over your attempts is what matters the most<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Understanding your strengths and weaknesses and cross a score equivalent of 90th percentile and then shoot for the stars. Sometimes being overambitious can mess up with your exam execution. Be wary of that.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t\n\t
Scores<\/th>Percentile<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
175-180<\/td>99.5+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
155-160<\/td>99.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
125-130<\/td>95.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
105-110<\/td>90.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
80-85<\/td>80.0+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n\n\n\n
\n