The only way to master VARC during your CAT Preparation is by practicing actual CAT question paper. Practice RCs with detailed video and text solutions from Previous CAT Question Papers.
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose
the best answer for each question.
In 2006, the Met [art museum in the US] agreed to return
the Euphronios krater, a masterpiece Greek urn that had been a museum draw since 1972. In 2007,
the Getty [art museum in the US] agreed to return 40 objects to Italy, including a marble
Aphrodite, in the midst of looting scandals. And in December, Sotheby's and a private owner
agreed to return an ancient Khmer statue of a warrior, pulled from auction two years before, to
Cambodia.
Cultural property, or patrimony, laws limit the transfer of cultural
property outside the source country's territory, including outright export prohibitions and
national ownership laws. Most art historians, archaeologists, museum officials and policymakers
portray cultural property laws in general as invaluable tools for counteracting the ugly legacy
of Western cultural imperialism.
During the late 19th and early
20th century — an era former Met director Thomas Hoving called "the age of
piracy" — American and European art museums acquired antiquities by hook or by crook, from
grave robbers or souvenir collectors, bounty from digs and ancient sites in impoverished but
art-rich source countries. Patrimony laws were intended to protect future archaeological
discoveries against Western imperialist designs. . . .
I surveyed 90 countries with
one or more archaeological sites on UNESCO's World Heritage Site list, and my study shows that
in most cases the number of discovered sites diminishes sharply after a country passes a
cultural property law. There are 222 archaeological sites listed for those 90 countries. When
you look into the history of the sites, you see that all but 21 were discovered before the
passage of cultural property laws. . . .
Strict cultural patrimony laws are popular
in most countries. But the downside may be that they reduce incentives for foreign governments,
nongovernmental organizations and educational institutions to invest in overseas exploration
because their efforts will not necessarily be rewarded by opportunities to hold, display and
study what is uncovered. To the extent that source countries can fund their own archaeological
projects, artifacts and sites may still be discovered. . . . The survey has far-reaching
implications. It suggests that source countries, particularly in the developing world, should
narrow their cultural property laws so that they can reap the benefits of new archaeological
discoveries, which typically increase tourism and enhance cultural pride. This does not mean
these nations should abolish restrictions on foreign excavation and foreign claims to
artifacts.
China provides an interesting alternative approach for source nations
eager for foreign archaeological investment. From 1935 to 2003, China had a restrictive cultural
property law that prohibited foreign ownership of Chinese cultural artifacts. In those years,
China's most significant archaeological discovery occurred by chance, in 1974, when peasant
farmers accidentally uncovered ranks of buried terra cotta warriors, which are part of Emperor
Qin's spectacular tomb system.
In 2003, the Chinese government switched course,
dropping its cultural property law and embracing collaborative international archaeological
research. Since then, China has nominated 11 archaeological sites for inclusion in the World
Heritage Site list, including eight in 2013, the most ever for China.
Question 10 : It can be inferred from the passage that archaeological sites are considered important by some source countries because they:
Note the lines, 'The survey has far-reaching implications. It suggests that
source countries, particularly in the developing world, should narrow their cultural property
laws so that they can reap the benefits of new archaeological discoveries, which typically
increase tourism and enhance cultural pride'. So, it can be inferred from the passage that
archaeological sites are considered important by some source countries because they give a boost
to the tourism sector. Option A is the correct answer choice.
The question is " It can be inferred from the passage that archaeological sites are considered important by some source countries because they: "
Choice A is the correct answer.
Copyrights © All Rights Reserved by 2IIM.com - A Fermat Education Initiative.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
CAT® (Common Admission Test) is a registered trademark of the Indian Institutes of Management. This website is not endorsed or approved by IIMs.
2IIM Online CAT Coaching
A Fermat Education Initiative,
58/16, Indira Gandhi Street,
Kaveri Rangan Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai 600 093
Mobile: (91) 99626 48484 / 94459 38484
WhatsApp: WhatsApp Now
Email: info@2iim.com