XAT 2023 Question Paper | Bussiness Decision Making
XAT Previous Year Paper | XAT BDM Questions | Question 17
CAT Questions
The best questions to practice for XAT Exam are the actual XAT Question Papers. 2IIM offers you exactly that, in a student friendly format to take value from this. In XAT 2023 we saw some beautiful questions that laid emphasis on Learning ideas from basics and being able to comprehend more than remembering gazillion formulae and shortcuts. Original XAT Question paper is the best place to start off your XAT prep practice. This page provides exactly that. To check out about 1000 CAT Level questions with detailed video solutions for free, go here: CAT Question Bank
Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.
In recent years, complaints of sexual harassment at “Fair Consulting” had increased exponentially. Fair Consulting had a gender-neutral, anti-sexual harassment policy and a committee to adjudicate on complaints. During the hearing of complaints, allegations and counter-allegations would fly thick and fast. This made it difficult for the adjudicating committee to conclusively decide on the complaints.
Question 17 : Of late, the adjudicating committee received a complaint from a junior female consultant. Her immediate boss cracked a bawdy joke about her in the office tuck shop. When the committee probed the alleged misconduct, they identified an independent witness. She agreed to give her testimony to the committee: however, she was unsure if she would like to be identified either by the complainant or the accused. The convenor of the committee was confused about the stance to be taken on the witness’s concern.
Which of the following will be the BEST stance to be taken by the convenor?
- The convenor should not allow witness’s identity to be revealed as either the accused or the complainant can use the witness’s arguments to their advantage.
- The convenor should not let witness’s identity be revealed as it might expose her to a threat either from the respondent or the accused.
- The convenor should ensure that witness identify herself as it will ensure that she will not present frivolous proof related to the inquiry.
- The convenor should not allow witness’s identity to be revealed because complainant can sabotage the inquiry process.
- The convenor should ensure that the witness identifies herself because both the accused and the complainant must identify themselves.
The convenor should not let witness’s identity be revealed as it might expose her to a threat either from the respondent or the accused.
🎉 Ace the Final Stretch with our Last Mile Excellence – Your Ultimate CAT 2024 Boost!
Click here!
Video Explanation
Best CAT Coaching in Chennai
CAT Coaching in Chennai - CAT 2022
Limited Seats Available - Register Now!
Explanatory Answer
Explanation will be uploaded soon...
The question is " Of late, the adjudicating committee received a complaint from a junior female consultant. Her immediate boss cracked a bawdy joke about her in the office tuck shop. When the committee probed the alleged misconduct, they identified an independent witness. She agreed to give her testimony to the committee: however, she was unsure if she would like to be identified either by the complainant or the accused. The convenor of the committee was confused about the stance to be taken on the witness’s concern.
Which of the following will be the BEST stance to be taken by the convenor? "
Hence, the answer is 'The convenor should not let witness’s identity be revealed as it might expose her to a threat either from the respondent or the accused.'
Choice B is the correct answer.
🎉 Ace the Final Stretch with our Last Mile Excellence – Your Ultimate CAT 2024 Boost!
