The only way to master VARC during your CAT Preparation is by practicing actual CAT question paper. Practice RCs with detailed video and text solutions from Previous CAT Question Papers.
The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose
the best answer for each question.
Many human phenomena and characteristics –
such as behaviors, beliefs, economies, genes, incomes, life expectancies, and other things
– are influenced both by geographic factors and by non-geographic factors. Geographic
factors mean physical and biological factors tied to geographic location, including climate, the
distributions of wild plant and animal species, soils, and topography. Non-geographic factors
include those factors subsumed under the term culture, other factors subsumed under the term
history, and decisions by individual people. . . .
[T]he differences between the
current economies of North and South Korea . . . cannot be attributed to the modest
environmental differences between [them] . . . They are instead due entirely to the different
[government] policies . . . At the opposite extreme, the Inuit and other traditional peoples
living north of the Arctic Circle developed warm fur clothes but no agriculture, while
equatorial lowland peoples around the world never developed warm fur clothes but often did
develop agriculture. The explanation is straightforwardly geographic, rather than a cultural or
historical quirk unrelated to geography. . . . Aboriginal Australia remained the sole continent
occupied only by hunter/gatherers and with no indigenous farming or herding . . . [Here the]
explanation is biogeographic: the Australian continent has no domesticable native animal species
and few domesticable native plant species. Instead, the crops and domestic animals that now make
Australia a food and wool exporter are all non-native (mainly Eurasian) species such as sheep,
wheat, and grapes, brought to Australia by overseas colonists.
Today, no scholar
would be silly enough to deny that culture, history, and individual choices play a big role in
many human phenomena. Scholars don't react to cultural, historical, and individual-agent
explanations by denouncing "cultural determinism," "historical determinism," or "individual
determinism," and then thinking no further. But many scholars do react to any explanation
invoking some geographic role, by denouncing "geographic determinism" . . .
Several
reasons may underlie this widespread but nonsensical view. One reason is that some geographic
explanations advanced a century ago were racist, thereby causing all geographic explanations to
become tainted by racist associations in the minds of many scholars other than geographers. But
many genetic, historical, psychological, and anthropological explanations advanced a century ago
were also racist, yet the validity of newer non-racist genetic etc. explanations is widely
accepted today.
Another reason for reflex rejection of geographic explanations is
that historians have a tradition, in their discipline, of stressing the role of contingency (a
favorite word among historians) based on individual decisions and chance. Often that view is
warranted . . . But often, too, that view is unwarranted. The development of warm fur clothes
among the Inuit living north of the Arctic Circle was not because one influential Inuit leader
persuaded other Inuit in 1783 to adopt warm fur clothes, for no good environmental
reason.
A third reason is that geographic explanations usually depend on detailed
technical facts of geography and other fields of scholarship . . . Most historians and
economists don't acquire that detailed knowledge as part of the professional training.
Question 4 : The author criticises scholars who are not geographers for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:
All options except B relate to the contents of the passage. The author does not
state or imply that scholars who are not geographers make outdated interpretations of past
cultural and historical phenomena.
Options A and C true, based on the lines, 'Today, no
scholar would be silly enough to deny that culture, history, and individual choices play a big
role in many human phenomena. Scholars don't react to cultural, historical, and individual-agent
explanations by denouncing "cultural determinism," "historical determinism," or "individual
determinism," and then thinking no further. But many scholars do react to any explanation
invoking some geographic role, by denouncing "geographic determinism"...'
Option D is
true, based on the lines, 'Another reason for reflex rejection of geographic explanations is
that historians have a tradition, in their discipline, of stressing the role of contingency (a
favorite word among historians) based on individual decisions and chance. Often that view is
warranted . . . But often, too, that view is unwarranted.'
The question is " The author criticises scholars who are not geographers for all of the following reasons EXCEPT: "
Choice B is the correct answer.
Copyrights © All Rights Reserved by 2IIM.com - A Fermat Education Initiative.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
CAT® (Common Admission Test) is a registered trademark of the Indian Institutes of Management. This website is not endorsed or approved by IIMs.
2IIM Online CAT Coaching
A Fermat Education Initiative,
58/16, Indira Gandhi Street,
Kaveri Rangan Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai 600 093
Mobile: (91) 99626 48484 / 94459 38484
WhatsApp: WhatsApp Now
Email: info@2iim.com