CLAT 2020 | Logical Reasoning

Logical Reasoning | Previous Year Questions

CLAT Logical Reasoning

CLAT Logical Reasoning section tests the candidates’ ability to frame arguments based on premise(s), and draw conclusions and inferences. Though the passages do not require as much prowess over the English language as such, the ability to read and comprehend them quickly will come in handy. This section is more about making logical conclusions about an idea, as inferred from the passages.

The following CLAT Logical Reasoning questions have been framed with adequate focus on the difficulty level of CLAT. The passages have been chosen with an eye on diversity of topics and the variety of themes and arguments.

Try these questions out for free, to check your mettle on CLAT Logical Reasoning!

CLAT 2020 Logical Reasoning: COVID-19 induced 'Force Majeure' in Contracts

Some readers wondered whether my reading of the crisis in the news media is about journalism or about the news industry. Though the fortunes of the news industry have a bearing on journalism, there is, indeed, a difference between looking at issues that govern journalism and the factors that contribute to the financial stress of the media industry. Over the last few years, I have been discussing the impact of digitalisation on journalism. The pandemic has accelerated the process of digital transformation of the news media. Therefore, these issues need close scrutiny. One of the defining elements of analog journalism was the way two crucial functions of journalism — bearing witness and making sense — complemented each other and helped people make informed choices. When I talk about the strength of analog, I am neither romanticising the past nor am I a Luddite. Most importantly, I do not believe in nostalgia. Many scholars have established ―how rose-coloured glasses always leads to an unfair distortion — looking back on the best of the past while comparing it to the worst of the present.‖ Hence, when I talk about the digital information news environment, I am talking about how there needs to be a conducive atmosphere for credible information to resonate with the people. Literature on misinformation, disinformation and malinformation reveals a new distinction in the minds of the citizens. Editors and journalists have to contend with a new breed of sceptics. These are the people who trust social media forwards more than evidence-based, data-driven journalism. Their confirmation bias flows from encrypted social media platforms that are full of conspiracy theories.
[Excerpt from an Article by A.S. Panneerselvan, The Hindu, dated August 10, 2020]

In this line, "Hence, when I talk about the digital information news environment, I am talking about how there needs to be a conducive atmosphere for credible information to resonate with the people" the Author assumes that:

  1. The Digital news is neither evidence based nor data driven.
  2. The Digital journalism does not help people in making informed choices.
  3. Both a and b
  4. The impact of Digital journalism has created an informed platform of journalism.

Explanatory Answer

The author clearly thinks that digital news is neither data-driven, nor evidence-based. He thinks there needs to be a ‘conducive atmosphere’ in digital sources to let only credible information flow to people. So, digital media distorts that conducive atmosphere – thus not letting people make informed choices about what they consume.

ICFAI Business School 2IIM CAT Online Coaching Classes 2IIM CAT Online Coaching Classes