XAT 2025 Question Paper | Bussiness Decision Making

XAT Previous Year Paper | XAT BDM Questions | Question 14
404 Not Found

404 Not Found


nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)

The best questions to practice for XAT Exam are the actual XAT Question Papers. 2IIM offers you exactly that, in a student friendly format to take value from this. In XAT 2025 we saw some beautiful questions that laid emphasis on Learning ideas from basics and being able to comprehend more than remembering gazillion formulae and shortcuts. Original XAT Question paper is the best place to start off your XAT prep practice. This page provides exactly that. To check out about 1000 CAT Level questions with detailed video solutions for free, go here: CAT Question Bank

Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.

Mr. Zubin Mistry is the owner and the chief editor of the newspaper The Pluralist, renowned for its high reporting standards and outstanding writing quality. The Pluralist’s authentic reporting distinguishes it from other newspapers that sensationalize news. They are responsible employers, known to be highly supportive towards their employees. Its news editing team is led by Ms. Ramya Kattabomman, a respected veteran in the newspaper reporting industry, well-known for her stringent adherence to the ethical standards of newspaper reporting.
Mr. Aditya Swaroop Verma, an award-winning senior journalist, has brought in an exposé into the activities of a mining company, operating in an ecologically vulnerable area. In his hard-hitting reporting style, he has presented interviews with tens of people, delineating how the mining company has used illegal means to start mining in that area. These mining activities may lead to the destruction of the local ecological balance. However, Aditya Swaroop is unable to obtain an interview with the management of the mining company.
Aditya Swaroop’s investigative report article offers significant revelations about the alleged illegal activities of the mining company which were hardly covered in the media otherwise. Nevertheless, his sources have requested for complete anonymity.

Question 14 :After the article is published next morning in The Pluralist, it goes viral. However, the mining company pushes back with a public declaration, contesting some of the findings of the article. While the potential inaccuracies do not entirely invalidate the article, they substantially undermine its message if proven true.
When Ramya asks Aditya Swaroop to bring in further proof to publish a rebuttal, he informs her that his sources, for a vital part of the article, were two employees recently fired by the mining company. And, they now admit that they were not completely honest in their initial interaction with him. Though some points raised in the article might still be valid, it is difficult to separate the inaccuracies given the unreliability of the sources. Ramya immediately brings it to the attention of Zubin, while admitting that she hastily permitted the publication of the article.

What is the MOST responsible action should Zubin take, keeping in view the recent developments due to the inaccuracies of the article?

  1. Publish an article accusing the mining company of bullying witnesses to change their versions.
  2. Publish a modified version of the article next day, defending the investigative journalism of Aditya Swaroop.
  3. Retract the entire article, and publish that Aditya Swaroop will no longer be with the newspaper.
  4. Retract the entire article, and publish Ramya’s apology in the newspaper.
  5. Publish a follow-up article disclosing the identity of the sources used for the article, attributing the responsibility of the errors to them.

Best CAT Online Coaching
Try upto 40 hours for free
Learn from the best!


2IIM : Best Online CAT Coaching.


Video Explanation


Best CAT Coaching in Chennai


CAT Coaching in Chennai - CAT 2022
Limited Seats Available - Register Now!


Explanatory Answer

Ramya and the newspaper did make a mistake by publishing the article in a haste and not completing their due diligence. It’s unfortunate that the sources were dishonest but the onus still rests on Aditya and Ramya as the leader of the editing team to ensure that they are publishing factually correct information. Hence it’s best for the newspaper to retract the entire article and Ramya to take ownership and issue an apology given that she leads the editing team.

A – This is unethical and would be completely irresponsible on part of Zubin given that his own team is at fault.

B – Aditya made a mistake by not doing his due diligence. Defending him in this situation is not a responsible action at all.

C – This may seem appealing, but the punishment does not fit the crime here. Yes, Aditya made a mistake. He should have conducted due diligence to be absolutely sure of the information. However, the core problem is that his sources lied to him. Hence, firing him in this situation is not justified.

E – This is highly unethical given the sources had always requested to be anonymous. The newspaper is also at fault and the most responsible action would be to take ownership of their mistake.


The question is " What is the MOST responsible action should Zubin take, keeping in view the recent developments due to the inaccuracies of the article? "

Hence, the answer is 'Retract the entire article, and publish Ramya’s apology in the newspaper.'

Choice D is the correct answer.

CAT Questions | CAT Quantitative Aptitude

CAT Questions | Verbal Ability for CAT


Where is 2IIM located?

2IIM Online CAT Coaching
A Fermat Education Initiative,
58/16, Indira Gandhi Street,
Kaveri Rangan Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai 600 093

How to reach 2IIM?

Mobile: (91) 99626 48484 / 94459 38484
WhatsApp: WhatsApp Now
Email: info@2iim.com