IPMAT 2022 Question Paper IPM Indore Verbal Ability. Solve questions from IPMAT 2022 Question Paper from IPM Indore and check the solutions to get adequate practice. The best way to ace IPMAT is by solving IPMAT Question Paper. To solve other IPMAT Sample papers, go here: IPM Sample Paper
Read the following passage and choose the answer that is closest to
each of
the questions that are based on the passage.
On the 14th of May 1796,
vaccine matter was taken from the hand of a dairy maid, Sarah Nelmes, and inserted
by two
superficial incisions in the arms of James Phipps, a healthy boy of about eight
years of
age. The boy went through an attack of cowpox as expected. After this, however, it
was
necessary to determine whether he was protected from smallpox. After waiting two
months
Jenner inoculated him with material from a smallpox patient. He was delighted to
note that
the boy was not affected by smallpox.
By 1798, Jenner had succeeded in
demonstrating the protective quality of the cowpox virus against smallpox, by
putting on
record details of 23 cases, contracted either casually or by direct inoculation.
Sixteen of
these had occurred accidentally among dairy workers in the course of occupations
connected
with cows and horses; the rest were done under Jenner's direction. Among the persons
inoculated was Jenner's own little second son, Robert Harding Jenner, an infant
eleven
months old. Jenner demonstrated conclusively that the cowpox protects the human
constitution
from the infection of smallpox.
After Dr. Jenner had made his tests, he
prepared
a pamphlet for publication. He also went to London, so that he might have the
opportunity to
introduce the subject personally to friends and demonstrate the truth of his
assertion to
them. He remained in London for nearly three months without being able to find
anyone who
would submit to vaccination. Jenner went back to Gloucestershire, disappointed. It
happened,
however, that soon after his return home, a distinguished London surgeon named Cline
resolved to make a trial of the vaccine material which Jenner had left with his
friends.
The patient was a child suffering from a form of chronic
hip-joint
disease. The vaccine material was inoculated, and the vaccine vehicle ran rather a
normal
course and healed fully. The little patient was afterward inoculated with smallpox
virus and
found to be incapable of acquiring that disease. This case attracted considerable
attention.
The child was in a run-down condition, and the vaccine material might very well have
provoked a rather serious local reaction. In a way, the fate of vaccination hung in
the
balance and good luck was in its favour. Mr. Cline, however, after this, became a
strong
advocate of vaccination, and brought it very decidedly before the London
physicians.
It was not long before the opposition to the practice of
vaccination
took definite form. One of the best-known London physicians of the time, Dr.
Ingenhouz,
became the leader of a strong faction of the medical profession of London, who not
only
would have nothing to do with vaccination, but proclaimed openly that it was a
dangerous
innovation, absolutely unjustifiable, and communicated a disease without protecting
against
any other. Dr. Watt from Glasgow blamed the vaccine for the increase in severe cases
of
measles and measles-related deaths among children.
Fortunately, only a
few
colleagues were so illogical, and an excellent idea of how much Jenner's discovery
was
appreciated by his contemporaries may be obtained from the number of honours,
diplomas,
addresses and communications from public bodies and distinguished individuals which
he
received. Most of the prominent medical and scientific societies of Europe elected
him a
member or sent him some special token of recognition.
Question 9 : According to the author, the main idea in the passage is
Option 1: This option is incorrect. Jenner faced rejection in London (an
urban center) and succeeded only after trials in Gloucestershire. The passage does
not link breakthroughs to urban settings.
Option 2: This option is incorrect. While Jenner documented 23 cases, this was a
tool to prove efficacy, not the central theme.
Option 3: This option is incorrect. Though vaccine hesitancy (e.g., Dr. Watt’s
opposition) is mentioned, the passage’s purpose is broader: it chronicles Jenner’s
journey, how risks and luck shaped vaccination’s success, not just hesitancy.
Option 4: This option is correct. Testing the vaccine on a weakened, "run-down"
child could have backfired, but it instead proved vaccination’s safety and efficacy.
Also statements like “good luck was in its favour” and “the fate of vaccination hung
in the balance” highlight how uncertain the experiment’s success was.
Choice D is the correct answer.
Copyrights © All Rights Reserved by 2IIM.com - A Fermat Education Initiative.
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions
CAT® (Common Admission Test) is a registered trademark of the Indian
Institutes of Management. This website is not endorsed or approved by IIMs.
2IIM Online CAT Coaching
A Fermat Education Initiative,
58/16, Indira Gandhi
Street,
Kaveri Rangan Nagar, Saligramam, Chennai 600 093
Mobile: (91) 99626 48484 / 94459
38484
WhatsApp: WhatsApp Now
Email: info@2iim.com